Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives
(eBook)

Book Cover
Published:
[Place of publication not identified] : Colorado Christian University, 2023.
Format:
eBook
Content Description:
1 online resource (manuscript).
Status:
Available Online
Description

Abstract: Rubrics have been used in academic environments, yet a process for developing a rubric focused on healthcare organizational strategic goals as a means of prioritizing interprofessional continuing staff education has not been described. This evidence-based practice project developed and tested a rubric to assign numerical priority to requests for CE activities based on the alignment to the organizational strategic goals. In Phase 1 participants included 26 nurse leaders from the Idaho Center for Nursing who completed a two-part electronic survey to identify the most important organizational strategic goals. Consensus agreement was achieved in round one using a 1-5 Likert Scale and yes/no responses in round two. In Phase 2, a prioritization rubric was developed from Phase 1 responses. In Phase 3, the prioritization rubric was tested to evaluate 24 separate education requests submitted over two fiscal years. Data regarding if the education request should be accepted or not accepted were analyzed using Intellectus Software. Applying the scorecard to incoming requests for continuing education from various interprofessional team members resulted in forming a decision-making process consistent with organizational priorities. One request that aligned with three or more organizational priorities was approved, 11 requests for education aligned with one or no goals should not have been approved. Using a scorecard designed to reflect the organization’s strategic goals was found to be an objective, effective method to prioritize proposed continuing education presentations which easily adhered to budgetary guidelines. Key words: continuing education priorities, educational priorities, interprofessional, nursing leaders, organizational mission, strategic priorities.

Copies
CCU Electronic Resources
More Like This
Citations
APA Citation (style guide)

Friel, M. (2023). Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives. [Place of publication not identified], Colorado Christian University.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation (style guide)

Friel, Marketa. 2023. Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives. [Place of publication not identified], Colorado Christian University.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities Citation (style guide)

Friel, Marketa, Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives. [Place of publication not identified], Colorado Christian University, 2023.

MLA Citation (style guide)

Friel, Marketa. Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives. [Place of publication not identified], Colorado Christian University, 2023.

Note! Citation formats are based on standards as of July 2022. Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy.
More Copies In Prospector
Loading Prospector Copies...
More Details
Language:
English

Notes

Description
Abstract: Rubrics have been used in academic environments, yet a process for developing a rubric focused on healthcare organizational strategic goals as a means of prioritizing interprofessional continuing staff education has not been described. This evidence-based practice project developed and tested a rubric to assign numerical priority to requests for CE activities based on the alignment to the organizational strategic goals. In Phase 1 participants included 26 nurse leaders from the Idaho Center for Nursing who completed a two-part electronic survey to identify the most important organizational strategic goals. Consensus agreement was achieved in round one using a 1-5 Likert Scale and yes/no responses in round two. In Phase 2, a prioritization rubric was developed from Phase 1 responses. In Phase 3, the prioritization rubric was tested to evaluate 24 separate education requests submitted over two fiscal years. Data regarding if the education request should be accepted or not accepted were analyzed using Intellectus Software. Applying the scorecard to incoming requests for continuing education from various interprofessional team members resulted in forming a decision-making process consistent with organizational priorities. One request that aligned with three or more organizational priorities was approved, 11 requests for education aligned with one or no goals should not have been approved. Using a scorecard designed to reflect the organization’s strategic goals was found to be an objective, effective method to prioritize proposed continuing education presentations which easily adhered to budgetary guidelines. Key words: continuing education priorities, educational priorities, interprofessional, nursing leaders, organizational mission, strategic priorities.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID:
ab46d262-7794-18fd-c6ef-55fa62de82a9
Go To GroupedWork

Record Information

Last Sierra Extract TimeApr 12, 2024 07:08:28 PM
Last File Modification TimeApr 12, 2024 07:08:51 PM
Last Grouped Work Modification TimeApr 12, 2024 07:08:38 PM

MARC Record

LEADER04486nam a22004817a 4500
001prefix22d83ec3-76ec-48e7-9812-0f06b648eac1
003ScCtBLL
00520230913210434.0
006m     o  d        
007cr u||||||||||
008230913p20232023xx      o    u00| u eng d
037 |5 BiblioBoard
040 |a ScCtBLL|b eng|c ScCtBLL
05014|a RT86.5 |b .F754 2023
1001 |a Friel, Marketa.
24510|a Prioritizing the Learning Needs of Interprofessional Clinical Staff to Support Organizational Strategic Initiatives /|c Marketa Friel.
264 1|a [Place of publication not identified] :|b Colorado Christian University,|c 2023.
300 |a 1 online resource (manuscript).
336 |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent
337 |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia
338 |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier
4901 |a CCU Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Report
520 |a Abstract: Rubrics have been used in academic environments, yet a process for developing a rubric focused on healthcare organizational strategic goals as a means of prioritizing interprofessional continuing staff education has not been described. This evidence-based practice project developed and tested a rubric to assign numerical priority to requests for CE activities based on the alignment to the organizational strategic goals. In Phase 1 participants included 26 nurse leaders from the Idaho Center for Nursing who completed a two-part electronic survey to identify the most important organizational strategic goals. Consensus agreement was achieved in round one using a 1-5 Likert Scale and yes/no responses in round two. In Phase 2, a prioritization rubric was developed from Phase 1 responses. In Phase 3, the prioritization rubric was tested to evaluate 24 separate education requests submitted over two fiscal years. Data regarding if the education request should be accepted or not accepted were analyzed using Intellectus Software. Applying the scorecard to incoming requests for continuing education from various interprofessional team members resulted in forming a decision-making process consistent with organizational priorities. One request that aligned with three or more organizational priorities was approved, 11 requests for education aligned with one or no goals should not have been approved. Using a scorecard designed to reflect the organization’s strategic goals was found to be an objective, effective method to prioritize proposed continuing education presentations which easily adhered to budgetary guidelines. Key words: continuing education priorities, educational priorities, interprofessional, nursing leaders, organizational mission, strategic priorities.
5880 |a Description based on print version record.
650 0|a Nursing services|x Administration|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093433|v Case studies.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh99001484
650 0|a Nursing|x Study and teaching (Continuing education)|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093384|x Evaluation.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00005674
650 0|a Nurses|x In-service training.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093351
650 0|a Medical informatics|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89005069|v Case studies.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh99001484
650 0|a Nurse practitioners.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093316
650 0|a Project management.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85065919
650 0|a Nursing.|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85093362
655 7|a Case studies.|2 lcgft|0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/genreForms/gf2017026140
830 0|a CCU Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Report.
907 |a .b67062982
933 |a Marcive found issue: "100 1 |a Friel, Marketa."
933 |a Marcive found issue: "830 0 |a CCU Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Report"
948 |a MARCIVE Overnight, in 2023.10
989 |1 .i148792984|d cceb|g j|m |h 0|x 0|t 0|i 0|j 188|k 230919|o -|w CCU Doctor of Nursing Practice Project Report|u https://ezproxy.ccu.edu/login?url=https://library.biblioboard.com/content/22d83ec3-76ec-48e7-9812-0f06b648eac1?organizationId=f0299ab5-78e2-49cf-a713-4a9755afe0d6
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.ltiac in 2023.10
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.elec in 2023.09
995 |a Loaded with m2btab.auth in 2023.10
998 |a cc|b 230918|c m|d z |e -|f eng|g cou|h 0|i 1
998 |e -|f eng|a cc