Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
(eBook)
Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields.
Fox, M. A., & Hackerman, N. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation (style guide)Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021 and Norman. Hackerman. 2003. Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities Citation (style guide)Fox, Marye Anne, 1947-2021 and Norman. Hackerman, Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2003.
MLA Citation (style guide)Fox, Marye Anne and Norman Hackerman. Evaluating and Improving Undergraduate Teaching in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2003.
Notes
Record Information
| Last File Modification Time | Apr 05, 2024 09:15:00 PM |
|---|---|
| Last Grouped Work Modification Time | Apr 27, 2024 06:39:57 AM |
MARC Record
| LEADER | 06230cam a2200697 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ocm52822423 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20240329122006.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr cn||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 030811s2003 dcu ob 001 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a N$T|b eng|e pn|c N$T|d YDXCP|d OCLCG|d OCLCQ|d COF|d OCLCQ|d NTE|d OCLCQ|d TUU|d OCLCQ|d TNF|d OCLCQ|d GRPVE|d OCLCO|d OCLCQ|d OUN|d IDEBK|d OCLCF|d OCLCQ|d OCLCO|d TJC|d BUF|d COO|d EBLCP|d OCLCQ|d AGLDB|d MOR|d PIFBR|d ZCU|d XFH|d OCLCQ|d MERUC|d OCLCQ|d SAV|d OCLCQ|d WY@|d U3W|d LUE|d UUM|d STF|d OCLCQ|d VTS|d UAB|d CRU|d ICG|d OCLCQ|d INT|d VT2|d TOF|d OCLCQ|d AU@|d OCLCQ|d OCLCA|d LVT|d TKN|d OCLCQ|d DKC|d OCLCQ|d M8D|d OCLCQ|d NJT|d OCLCQ|d K6U|d OCLCO|d OCLCQ|d OCLCO|d OCLCL | ||
| 019 | |a 51616540|a 67834969|a 814268793|a 962597412|a 994452968 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309512115|q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309512114|q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1280185171 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781280185175 | ||
| 020 | |z 0309072778|q (pbk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780309072779|q (pbk.) | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@|b 000026444668 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@|b 000051324069 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBBG|b BV043067611 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBBG|b BV044051844 | |
| 029 | 1 | |a DEBSZ|b 422421863 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)52822423|z (OCoLC)51616540|z (OCoLC)67834969|z (OCoLC)814268793|z (OCoLC)962597412|z (OCoLC)994452968 | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a Q181|b .E93 2003eb | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SCI|x 063000|2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a PD|2 bicssc | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 507.1|2 21 |
| 049 | |a MAIN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics /|c Marye Anne Fox and Norman Hackerman, editors ; Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council. |
| 260 | |a Washington, D.C. :|b National Academies Press,|c ©2003. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xiv, 215 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text|b txt|2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes index. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 128-138) and index. | ||
| 520 | 8 | |a Economic, academic, and social forces are causing undergraduate schools to start a fresh examination of teaching effectiveness. Administrators face the complex task of developing equitable, predictable ways to evaluate, encourage, and reward good teaching in science, math, engineering, and technology. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology offers a vision for systematic evaluation of teaching practices and academic programs, with recommendations to the various stakeholders in higher education about how to achieve change. What is good undergraduate teaching? This book discusses how to evaluate undergraduate teaching of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology and what characterizes effective teaching in these fields. Why has it been difficult for colleges and universities to address the question of teaching effectiveness? The committee explores the implications of differences between the research andteaching cultures -- and how practices in rewarding researchers could be transferred to the teaching enterprise. How should administrators approach the evaluation of individual faculty members? And how should evaluation results be used? The committee discusses methodologies, offers practical guidelines, and points out pitfalls. Evaluating, Rewarding, and Improving Effective Teaching in Undergraduate Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology provides a blueprint for institutions ready to build effective evaluation programs for teaching in science fields. | |
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Executive summary -- Part I. What is known : principles, research findings, and implementation issues -- Recent perspectives on undergraduate teaching and learning -- Characterizing and mobilizing effective undergraduate teaching -- Aligning the cultures of research and teaching in higher education -- Evaluating teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : principles and research findings -- Part II. Applying what is known : strategies for evaluating teaching effectiveness -- Evaluation methodologies -- Evaluation of individual faculty : criteria and benchmarks -- Evaluation of departmental undergraduate programs -- Recommendations -- Appendixes. Selected student evaluation instruments ; Samples of questionnaires used to evaluate undergraduate student learning ; Examples of questions for conducting peer evaluations of teaching ; Biographical sketches of committee members. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science|x Study and teaching|x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a College teaching|x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sciences|x Étude et enseignement|x Évaluation. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a SCIENCE|x Study & Teaching.|2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a College teaching|x Evaluation|2 fast | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Science|x Study and teaching|x Evaluation|2 fast | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fox, Marye Anne,|d 1947-2021.|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJcGr7m3WTcWh3wGwQVwG3 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hackerman, Norman. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.).|b Committee on Recognizing, Evaluating, and Rewarding Undergraduate Teaching. | |
| 758 | |i has work:|a Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Text)|1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFwRfjt7tWyWHPp4gjxfVP|4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version:|t Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.|d Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press, ©2003|z 0309072778|w (DLC) 2002013890|w (OCoLC)50606363 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://ezproxy.ccu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=86963 |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services|b ASKH|n AH36615058 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central|b EBLB|n EBL3563996 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost|b EBSC|n 86963 | ||
| 938 | |a Internet Archive|b INAR|n evaluatingimprov0000unse_f0v9 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services|b YANK|n 2293056 | ||
| 949 | 0 | 1 | |h 9|l cceb|s j|t 188|w EBSCO Academic : External |
| 994 | |a 92|b FCX | ||
